1. The man that was killed in the subway in New York, by being shoved into the tracks of the train. The photographer was able to take this photo because he just toked out his camera and staring shooting pictures at that very moment.
2. The photographer said he took the photo because his photos were incidental.
3. I think the photographer should had taken the photo because people need to see that there are actually people that get ran over by trains.
4. I think the photographer did his best in this situation because he captured some images before the train hit the man.
5. I agree that the photo should had been the front page of the New York Post because people would want to read what and why happened to the person that was killed by a train in the New York subway.
6. I think for a photojournalism is more important capturing an image of life as it happens instead of saving someones life because their photo can make it front page of a newspaper and get paid really well.
7. I don't think is very ethically acceptable to involve himself/herself in a situation that he or she photographs because the newspapers workers might not want to take the photo and put in the newspaper.
8. I think photojournalist should avoid influencing events as they happen because people would read about and would want to do it just to come out on front page of a newspaper.
9. Majority of the responser said that they should save lives first and then take pictures in second.
No comments:
Post a Comment